Cases 1 - 10 of 487
MALONE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00438
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, RANDY VANFLEET, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Defendant:
A. MOSELEY, D. BEDWELL, JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00426
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, MATTHEW LEOHR, JACQUELYNNE PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
DION JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROEDER v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, M. GIBLERT, JEREMY HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLIY v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01325
Petitioner:
FRANK H. ALLIY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORR v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2024cv00386
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, FRANK VANIHEL, REED and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00378
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Petitioner:
ROBERT PEACHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOTEN v. VANVLEET et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, R. VANVLEET and MATT LEOHR
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIEL v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2024cv00366
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, BRIAN LALOUX, JACQUELYNNE PORTER-MARTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 2:2024cv00359
Defendant:
WOLF, CRAWFORD, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
