Cases 1 - 10 of 262
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, LLC., GEO GROUP INC, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Defendant:
A. SMITH and GEO/N.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONG
Defendant:
LUNSFORD, GILBERT, GEO GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FITCH et al
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTT FITCH, TINA LEE and GEO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. GEO AND ITS GUARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HARVEY
Defendant:
GEO AND ITS GUARDS, MURPHY, MIKE SCHIDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
