Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jones v. Superintendent Walsh et al
as 1:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Superintendent Walsh and Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00424
Petitioner:
LARRY JONES
Respondent:
J.E. KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. USA
as 3:2015cv00058
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Larry Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peter Lewis v. Jerry Sternes, et al
as 13-3835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER A. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY L. STERNES, Warden at Dixon Correctional Center, NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden, Assistant Warden at Dixon Correctional Center, DIRK DUSING, Major at Dixon Correctional Center and others
Alexis v. Chandler et al
as 3:2012cv50223
Plaintiff:
Marvin Keith Alexis, Jr.
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Larry Jones and Curtis O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Lewis v. Jerry Sternes, et al
as 11-3297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER A. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY L. STERNES, Warden at Dixon Correctional Center, NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden, Asst Warden at Dixon Correctional Center, DIRK DUSING, Major at Dixon Correctional Center and others
Benyehudah Whitfield v. Illinois Dept of Corrections, et al
as 11-2352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENYEHUDAH WHITFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY KNOP, JERRY L. STERNES and others
Joseph Hurst v. Nedra Chandler, et al
as 11-1742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH R. HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden, CURTIS O'NEAL and LARRY JONES
Funches v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv50055
Plaintiff:
Perez Funches
Defendant:
Larry Jones, Nedra Chandler, Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Chandler et al
as 3:2011cv50037
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Hurst
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Curtis O'Neal and Larry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
