Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Munson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Meeks, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins, Donta v. Riewestahl, Dave et al
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Donta Jenkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Dave Riewestahl, Cpt. Holbrook, Sgt. Fields and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility and GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. State of Indiana et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gary M Conner
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Bill Brooks, Don Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
GARY M. CONNER
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, BILL BROOKS, DON MUNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Munson v. Faiyaz Ahmed, et al
as 22-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FAIYAZ AHMED, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WARDEN OF LAWRENCE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Lehn, Angelo v. Munson
as 3:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
Angelo Lehn
Defendant:
Officer Munson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munson v. Kink et al
as 3:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Director John Baldwin, Kevin Kink, C. Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munson v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2018cv02216
Defendant:
Faiyaz Ahmed and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munson v. Overall et al
as 3:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
L. Overall, Dr. Henderson, Dr. Newbold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Munson v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-3651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, JIM WINTERS, Food Service Supervisor III, Menard Correctional Center, SUZANN GRISWOLD-BAILEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
