Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BOOTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
SHAUN K. BOOTH
Defendant:
H.G. CHURCH, JOYCE K. CONLEY, T.K. COZZA-RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2010cv00253
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), JOHN DOES 1X THROUGH 6X, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
STANKO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 4:2010cv00109
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), JOHN DOES 1X THROUGH 6X, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
STANKO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 4:2010cv00096
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), HARLEY LAPPIN, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
COLLINS et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY COLLINS
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY, HELEN MARBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
METCALF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD METCALF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL ATWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRAHIM v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00330
Plaintiff:
JIBRIL LUGMAN IBRAHIM
Defendant:
RICK V. VEACH, MICHAEL NALLEY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCINTOSH v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
