Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harrison, Chardez v. Wall, Ed et al
as 3:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Officer T. Taves, Paul Westerhaus, Officer C. Peterlik and others
Plaintiff:
Chardez M. Harrison
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04747
Defendant:
McCallum RN, Rob Jeffreys, Officer C. Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Allen James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster, Deonte v. Buescher, C. et al
as 3:2019cv00244
Defendant:
Janesville S.P.D. Michael Rabbit, Pre-Lim Judge, Stephen Meyers, J.P.D and others
Plaintiff:
Deonte Ladell Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Allen County Commissioners of et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Allen County Commissioners of, Sheriff Gladeiux, Carla Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Chanse T Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Commissioner Bruce Lemmon, Superintendent Kathy Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Travis A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv01406
Plaintiff:
Tony Lyles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Sergent Gambine, Officesr Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYLE v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
LAFAYETTE DEMETRUIS BOYLE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN HECTOR JOYNER, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT and OFFICER C STEFFEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OCASIO v. HILL et al
as 1:2008cv01127
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. OCASIO
Defendant:
OFFICER W. HILL, OFF. K. CISSELL, OFF. M. MCCALIP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. THOMSON et al
as 2:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
OSCAR SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID THOMSON, INTERNAL AFFAIRS MR. MARSHALL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS - C/O K. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
