Cases 1 - 10 of 54
BAUGH v. PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT et al
as 2:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BAUGH
Defendant:
PARKE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT, JUSTIN COLE, ED ROACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. TAYLOR
Defendant:
JAY HUDSON and ED ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Roach et al
as 2:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
Romeo L Earving and Lawrence L Hancock
Defendant:
Nicole Roach, . Davis, Troy Wasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP SR
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP, SR.
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Boone County Adult Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv50147
Plaintiff:
Marshawn Wilson
Defendant:
Boone County Adult Detention Facility, Mrs. Roach, Mr. Svedin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Indiana Dept of Correction et al
as 3:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Glenn Handzlik, Pen Products, John Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Geene Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. USA
as 3:2020cv01097
Petitioner:
Rayshaun Roach
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BAYON v. ROACH et al
as 1:2019cv04943
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL 1, MARION COUNTY, JOHN LAYTON and others
Plaintiff:
ALHADJI F. BAYON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
