Cases 1 - 10 of 1,279
Rogers v. Lott
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03739
Plaintiff:
Kavarian Rogers
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wallace v. Koehnlein et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Trayshaun Wallace
Defendant:
Roger Koehnlein and Brandon Schulz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Rogers v. Nevin Webster, et al
as 24-1516
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROGERS
Defendant:
NEVIN WEBSTER and BRETT HELMER
Casillas v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Roger Casillas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barnes v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Rogers, Thomas J. Dart and Don Beacham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Rogers
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Allen Rogers
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison and Ron Neil
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01682
Petitioner:
Patrick D Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Dennis Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
