Cases 1 - 10 of 18
PAYNE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2013cv00005
Defendant:
STEVE CARTER, STATE OF INDIANA and SUPERINTENDENT
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINFREY v. BROWN et al
as 2:2012cv00156
Respondent:
EDWARD BROWN and STEVE CARTER
Petitioner:
DUAN WINFREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 10-3622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, Attorney General, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 08-3787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, Attorney General, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
PUCKETT v. CARTER et al
as 1:2008cv01364
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. PUCKETT
Defendant:
STEVE CARTER, IND. DEPT. OF CORRECTION and JOHNSON CO. SUPERIOR COURT, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Wright, Sr. v. Steve Carter
as 08-3234
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. WRIGHT, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE CARTER, State of Indiana Attorney General
Davison v. Carter
as 2:2008cv00151
Petitioner:
Kevin Jermaine Davison
Defendant:
Steve Carter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Wright, Sr. v. Steve Carter
as 08-2162
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. WRIGHT, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE CARTER, Indiana Attorney General, in his official capacity
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 08-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
WHATLEY v. SUPERINTENDANT WENDY KNIGHT et al
as 1:2008cv00541
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. WHATLEY, SR.
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT WENDY KNIGHT, OFFICER SANDERS and ATT. GEN. STEVE CARTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
