Cases 1 - 10 of 1,786
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
TODD E. COVINGTON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RANDALL, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Link v. Dronenberg et al
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Kaz Link
Defendant:
. Dronenberg, Cheryl Hansen, . Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. University of Illinois at Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04177
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence T. Williams v. Rose Albano, et al
as 24-1892
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRENDAN DAVIS, BRUCE SUGGS, SCOTT HUNKLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
