Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Alexandr Klimashevsky v. DEA
as 23-1543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDR KLIMASHEVSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Dong v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
He Song Dong
Defendant:
United States of America and Drug Enforcement Administration
Sainz v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
CRESCENCIO PABLO SAINZ
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, United States Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture of Property
Klimashevsky v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 3:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
Alexandr Klimashevsky
Defendant:
United State of America Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration and Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Lottie et al v. Winnebago County Sheriff's Department et. al.
as 3:2021cv50123
Defendant:
Rockford Police Department, Drug Enforcement Administration, Any And All Agencies and others
Plaintiff:
Tervarie T. Lottie
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
In Re the Seizure of: One 2018 Forester RV, $521,550.00 in US Currency, and miscellaneous property
as 3:2018mc00039
Movant:
Patrick N. Barber
Respondent:
USA , Department of Justice , Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rivera - Brigido v. Forfeiture Counsel, Asset Forfeiture Section, Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2013cv08921
Defendant:
Forfeiture Counsel, Asset Forfeiture Section, Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff:
Jorge Adrian Rivera - Brigido
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
SMITH v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 4:2010cv00055
In Re:
$10,761.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY AND THE STATE OF INDIANA
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Petitioner:
CHARLES R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
