Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Walgreens Company
as 1:2013cv04522
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Health and Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Deferred Saving Fund and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Buchberger, Stacy v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
Stacy Buchberger
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rish v. Walgreen Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists and Registered Nurses et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carl Rish
Defendant:
Walgreen Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists and Registered Nurses and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HOLZMEYER v. WALGREEN INCOME PROTECTION PLAN FOR PHARMACISTS AND REGISTERED NURSES
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLZMEYER
Defendant:
WALGREEN INCOME PROTECTION PLAN FOR PHARMACISTS AND REGISTERED NURSES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension, Welfare, Trust Fund v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2012cv05684
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension, Welfare, Trust Fund
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Deadmond v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Deadmond
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amich v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00105
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc and Walgreen Co
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Amich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Sanford v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2008cv06325
Plaintiff:
Rashad Sanford and Rashad Sanford
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
