Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Blue et al v. Bridge Legal Support Services LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03487
Plaintiff:
Shania Blue, Bob Megnath, Pedro Pacheco and others
Defendant:
Bridge Legal Support Services LLC, Bridge Legal Holdings LLC and Bridge Legal Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FARIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DALE FARIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, KATHY COWAN and TORI JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Capesius et al v. City of Evanston, Illinois
as 1:2022cv01754
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Capesius, Richard T Clucas, Jr., Joseph Des Jardins and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston, Illinois and City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TAYLOR v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02749
Plaintiff:
TORY TAYLOR
Defendant:
MHI SHARED SERVICES AMERICAS INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HAGGERTY et al v. MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00955
Defendant:
MONTE BLACK and MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS HAGGERTY and TORY SHAVER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Helm et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01206
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Acevez, Frederick R. Aldrich, Merlin Alexander and others
Defendant:
Alderwoods Group, Inc., Alderwoods Group, LLC, Paul A. Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters, et al v. W.R. Heintz & Assoc., Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03618
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters, et al
Defendant:
W.R. Heintz & Assoc., Inc., Tori Builders, Inc. and Timothy Heintz
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
