Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Federal Trade Commission v. Atkinson, et al
as 1:2008cv05666
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Lance Thomas Atkinson, Inet Ventures Pty Ltd., Jody Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Smith v. Donald Hulick
as 08-2001
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden
ASPEN GROUP, LLC v. SMITH et al
as 1:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
ASPEN GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL SMITH, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, IMC CREDIT SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Smith v. Donald Hulick
as 08-1403
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07072
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07073
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07069
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07070
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07071
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
