Cases 101 - 110 of 351
Anderson v. Miles et al
as 1:2020cv02088
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Anderson
Defendant:
Shewin Milep, Frederick Lane, Karen Rabideau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Lane
as 4:2020cv04076
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jesus Sanchez
Respondent:
Timothy Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gakuba v. Swells et al
as 3:2020cv00277
Defendant:
Swells, Matthew Swells, Kimberly Birch and others
Plaintiff:
Gakuba and Peter Gakuba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Pritzker et al
as 2:2020cv02050
Defendant:
Aquelle M Stone, JB Pritzker, Laura McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Louis H Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schwartz et al v. Gubin et al
as 1:2020cv01376
Plaintiff:
Highland Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, 5720 West Markham Street Holdings, LLC, Hallmark Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC and others
Defendant:
552 Golf Links Road, LLC, The Waters of Cumberland, LLC, The Waters of Woodland Hills, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Axis Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv08424
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Axis Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gakuba v. Henderson
as 3:2019cv01273
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Mr. Henderson, Penny George, Vienna Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gakuba v. Wright et al
as 3:2019cv01274
Defendant:
Karen Pannier, Catherine Wright, Angela Mize and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. HSHS St Mary's et al
as 2:2019cv02312
Defendant:
Michael Hicks, Matt Mcollum, Terrence Pencek and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin M Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Watts et al
as 1:2019cv07552
Defendant:
Robert Gonzalez, Debra Kirby, Gerome Summers, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
