Cases 111 - 120 of 707
PRESSLEY et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
NIJUL ALEXANDER, JAMES R. PRESSLEY, AMIN RICKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Childers v. Brij et al
as 1:2021cv02286
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshal Service, 7th District and others
Plaintiff:
Carl D Childers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hester v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Edison Hester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Rivers et al
as 3:2021cv50155
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Christopher Rivers and others
Plaintiff:
Daryle Bernard Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AHMED v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2021cv00178
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER and U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHAFFER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILSON, KRUEGER, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ward v. Santo et al
as 3:2021cv50154
Defendant:
Mr. Gross, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
De'Montray Larell Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bevly v. United States Justice Department et al
as 1:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Don E. Bevly
Defendant:
- Wilkens, R.A. Heisner, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Welker v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv00248
Respondent:
C. Gore, Michael Carvajal, The Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Jed Welker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pipps v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50080
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, USP Thomson, J. Gilley and others
Petitioner:
Craig Pipps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
