Cases 11 - 20 of 526
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv04514
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
John Doe(s), Deputy Richardson, Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Jail/D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv04517
Defendant:
Cook County Jail/D.O.C., Response Team, Deputy Manzella and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. De la Rosa et al
as 1:2024cv04519
Defendant:
Limpkins and De la Rosa
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermack Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04526
Defendant:
Cook County Health and Hospital System, Cermack Health Services and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept et al
as 1:2024cv04529
Defendant:
Kiuilkes, Thomas J. Dart, H Sorte and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv04381
Defendant:
J. Mandella Barnes, Mandela Barnes, Mandela Barnes for Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barnes v. DG Retail, LLC
as 1:2024cv03222
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Barnes
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC d/b/a Dollar General and DG Retail, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
