Cases 11 - 20 of 791
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Chris Watkins, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Wills
as 3:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Chris Moore
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. Fitzgerald
as 1:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Brian Johnson, Carri Roe Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ubera v. C.G.C.G., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo C. Hernandez Ubera
Defendant:
C.G.C.G., Inc., Chris Pontikis, Alexandra Pontikis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Roe 1 et al v. Ehoule, et al
as 1:2023cv17002
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2, Jane Roe 3 and others
Defendant:
Christian Azane Ehoule and Shanghai Chris Success Import & Export Trading Co. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
