Cases 11 - 20 of 111
James Gilman v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
as 19-2677
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL BYRD, Doctor, CHELSEY PEARISON, BARBARA RIGGS, RN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. GILMAN
WALTERS v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00415
Defendant:
TONI JORDAN, RACHAEL HOUGHTON, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY-EL v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv03138
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, V. SHEPHERD, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv02525
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, RICHARD BROWN, R.D.C. MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Summers v. Jeff Conway, et al
as 19-1672
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF CONWAY, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and MS. GRIFFIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SUMMERS, also known as Charles B. Summers
Graham v. Carter et al
as 3:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, J Piggot, Corizon Medical Service and others
Plaintiff:
Darcel Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deane v. Wexford Medical Services
as 3:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Services, Ron Neal, Corizon Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Deane
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY v. CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv03977
Plaintiff:
KEITH D. ABNEY
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, REBECCA J. TRIVETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYTON v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv03858
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON MEDICAL and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Conway et al
as 3:2018cv00982
Defendant:
Angie Heishman, Kelly Mitchell, Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Summers and Charles B Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
