Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ball v. Ball et al
as 3:2009cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant:
Carol L. Ball and Christopher Kokish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ball v. Blunt
as 3:2009cv00404
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant:
Arthur Paul Blunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Emerson Tucker v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 09-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director of Cook County Department of Corrections and others
Riley v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2009cv02267
Plaintiff:
Willie Anne Riley
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Dennis Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ball v. Southwest Fiduciary, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant:
Southwest Fiduciary, Inc., Gregory P. Dovico, Peggy Ann Dovico and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tucker et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tucker
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County, Illinois, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Dart et al
as 1:2008cv05744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hall
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Department of Corrections, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ball v. Mid-Country Bankshares et al
as 3:2008cv00656
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant:
Mid-Country Bankshares, Neeley Law Firm and Joseph J. Neeley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roger Fairley v. Dennis Andrews
as 07-3343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER FAIRLEY and RICHARD GACKOWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS ANDREWS, EDWARD BYRNE, GREGORY ERNST and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
