Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Deloach v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
Ella Deloach
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deloach et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
Ella Wease Deloach and Tyrone Deloach
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv11688
Plaintiff:
Natasha Harris , Denita Fitzgerald , Alexis Raiford and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaurin et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv13510
Plaintiff:
Mary McLaurin and Jacquelyn Lewis Deloach
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Berlex Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeLoach v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv11365
Plaintiff:
Regina DeLoach
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deloach v. People et al
as 1:2009cv04665
Petitioner:
Erskin Deloach
Respondent:
People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
