Cases 11 - 20 of 580
Henderson v. Huges et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Perry Henderson
Defendant:
Latoya Huges, Rob Jeffreys, Charles Truitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crawford v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Tyreese Crawford
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Director of IDOC Rob Jeffreys, Charles Truitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pickett v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Trolus Pickett
Defendant:
David Gomez, John Doe, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nania v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2023cv16967
Plaintiff:
John Nania
Defendant:
JB Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gomez v. Will County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv16881
Plaintiff:
James E. Gomez
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Center, Mike Kelly, Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gillespie v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16231
Plaintiff:
Miko Gillespie
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, CHARLES O'CONNOR and ALEC GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
