Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Herbst v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Herbst
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CM Global Sourcing Company, Ltd. et al v. Heritage Safe Co., Ltd.
as 1:2013cv03388
Plaintiff:
CM Global Sourcing Company, Ltd. and Herbst Produkt
Defendant:
Heritage Safe Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Baumann et al v. E I du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
John Baumann , Barbara Baumann , Richard Bloomberg and others
Defendant:
E I du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perl et al v. Laux/Arnold Incorporated et al
as 1:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Dave M Perl , Kevin Glave , Scott Foltz and others
Defendant:
Laux/Arnold Incorporated , L-A Electric Employee Benefit Program , William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Herbst v. Mark Sevier
as 10-2171
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HERBST
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv08040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Herbst v. EMCO Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv05823
Plaintiff:
Walter Herbst
Defendant:
EMCO Enterprises, Inc. and Andersen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Herbst v. Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00231
Petitioner:
Charlie Herbst
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herbst v. Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00144
Petitioner:
Charlie Herbst
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herbst v. Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Charlie Herbst
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
