Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 193
Christopher Pyles v. Randy Pfister
as 17-3478
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER PYLES
Respondent - Appellee: KIM BUTLER
Jones v. Butler
as 2:2017cv02298
Petitioner: Cornelius Jones
Respondent: Kim Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Courtney v. Kim Butler, et al
as 17-3310
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES COURTNEY
Defendant - Appellee: KIM BUTLER, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and TIM CHRISTIANSON, Chief of Parole
Anthony Enis v. Kim Butler
as 17-2958
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY ENIS
Respondent - Appellee: KIM BUTLER
Maurice Wallace v. John Baldwin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAURICE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN BALDWIN, KIM BUTLER, MIKE ATCHISON and others
James v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00623
Plaintiff: Jed James, 3rd
Defendant: John Baldwin, Kim Butler, C/O Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Courtney v. Kim Butler, et al
as 17-2194
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES COURTNEY
Defendant - Appellee: KIM BUTLER, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and TIM CHRISTIANSON, Chief of Parole
Matthews v. Butler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00366
Plaintiff: Jerel Matthews
Defendant: Kim Butler, Dr. Trost, Gail Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlon Watford v. Thomas LaFond, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLON L. WATFORD
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS LAFOND, SARAH WOOLLEY, Officer, KIM BUTLER, Warden and others
Scott Peters v. Donald Wilkerson, et al
as 17-1068
Petitioner: SCOTT PETERS
Respondent: DONALD G. WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge and NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge
Party-in-Interest: KIM BUTLER, Warden, JOHN TROST, Doctor, JOHN R. BALDWIN, IDOC Director in his official capacity only and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?