Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosas v. Advocate Christ Medical Center et al
as 1:2018cv05340
Defendant:
MacNeal Hospital, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Madden Mental Health Center and others
Plaintiff:
Maria M. Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flowers v. CO Collins et al
as 1:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Hassan Flowers
Defendant:
CO Collins, CO Webb, John Edward Coumbe-Lilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. High Quality Organics, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv09200
Plaintiff:
William Madden
Defendant:
High Quality Organics, Inc. and Raju Boligala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07635
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Yiyi, Zong Cai Luo and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Person v. Madden Hosital et al
as 1:2017cv05055
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Person
Defendant:
Madden Hosital, John Doe, Hosital Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walgren et al v. Heun et al
as 1:2017cv04036
Plaintiff:
Douglas Walgren and Maureen Walgren
Defendant:
Stephen Madden , James Konrad , Naperville Community Unit School District #203 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Madden Hospaid et al
as 1:2017cv01415
Plaintiff:
Richard Person
Defendant:
Madden Hospaid, John Joe and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Melvin
as 1:2017cv00724
Petitioner:
Irving Madden
Respondent:
Micheal B Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2016cv08354
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept 15th Dist., Roberta Walker, April Louise Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
