Cases 11 - 20 of 740
Nathaniel Harris v. Frank Littlejohn, et al
as 23-2083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, Assistant Superintendant, RICHARD BROWN, Warden, ANDREAN MASON, Supervisor and others
HOOTEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JACK HENDRIX, JERRY SYNDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hinthorne
as 1:2023cv02288
Petitioner:
Richard Brown
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Jenkins v. Richard Brown, et al
as 23-1540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECIL JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, JERRY SNYDER, CHARLES DUGAN and others
Michael Carrico v. Richard Brown, et al
as 23-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. CARRICO
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN GILMORE and others
PARISH v. BROWN et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PARISH
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JERRY SNYTER, BEVERLY GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRENCH v. VOIGHTSCHILD et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN FRENCH
Defendant:
M VOIGHTSCHILD, EWERS, PARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Voightschild et al
as 3:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman French
Defendant:
M Voightschild, Ewers, Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DUGAN et al
as 2:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
LEROY JONES and LEEROY JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES DUGAN, RICHARD BROWN, DONALDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
