Cases 11 - 20 of 40
PEARSON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00281
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clark v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bradley Scott Clark, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas Watson, Jeffrey Rendon, Sara M Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHORTRIDGE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00226
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
KELLY SHORTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LYTTLE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00200
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
MELVIN R. LYTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MELENDEZ v. JULIAN et al
as 2:2017cv00202
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
ALEX A. MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LYTTLE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00153
Defendant:
S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
MELVIN R. LYTTLE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DAVIS v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00152
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DEFFENBAUGH v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00149
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
LARRY DEFFENBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HEARD v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00148
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLUELLEN HEARD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jermel Pope v. M. Hewitt, et al
as 17-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. HEWITT, Mailroom Supervisor, JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
