Cases 11 - 20 of 331
Akello v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv06666
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ted H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Stella Akello
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harbaugh v. Hertrampf et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Defendant:
Wes Ray, Lieutenant Mr Trum and Sergeant Robi J Hertrampf
Plaintiff:
Ted Joseph Harbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETROVIC v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04160
Defendant:
Ted H Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
JELENA PETROVIC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sanchez Livia v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03811
Plaintiff:
LISBET SANCHEZ LIVIA
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, DIRECTOR OF USCIS UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
