Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,731
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
MILLER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner: KERRI MILLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HERRINGTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00623
Petitioner: JUSTIN HERRINGTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
LANSEL et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff: Catherine Lansel, John Kopatz, II and JOHN KOPATZ II
Defendant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TINDALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00549
Petitioner: GARY TINDALL, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RODGERS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00539
Petitioner: ROBERT RODGERS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RILEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00525
Petitioner: PIERRE RILEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MICHAELS v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner: THOMAS WAYNE MICHAELS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Van Wyen v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Mark William VanWyen and Mark William Van Wyen
Defendant: Thor Motor Coach Inc and Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?