Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Contreras v. Mitchell
as 1:2021cv04762
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Contreras
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras et al v. Illinois State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2021cv03139
Plaintiff:
Irene Padilla, Irvin Fuentes, Julie Contreras and others
Defendant:
Don Harmon, Katherine S O'Brien, Cassandra B. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes-Contreras v. Santarelli et al
as 1:2021cv03066
Plaintiff:
Omar de Jesus Cervantes-Contreras
Defendant:
Dale Santarelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras et al v. Zale Delaware, Inc.. et al
as 1:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Yanet Toscano and Adilene Contreras
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc., Zale Delaware, Inc., Signet Jewelers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ash v. The City of Aurora et al
as 1:2021cv00375
Defendant:
Sal Contreras, J Russell, Graciano Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Edward L Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Wynn et al
as 1:2020cv04072
Defendant:
Law Office of Michael A Galason, Classic Realty Group-IL, Inc., Daniel Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Soila Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Currey v. Kendall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv02254
Plaintiff:
Jacob M. Currey
Defendant:
Adriana Valdez Contreras, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Jeanne Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06928
Defendant:
Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie Contreras
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Velasquez Bautista v. Richardson et al
as 1:2019cv02976
Defendant:
Rozel Elazegui, Bobby Richardson, Contractor and others
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Velasquez Bautista
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
