Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Upthegrove, James v. MMHI Medical Director et al
as 3:2020cv00927
Defendant:
MMHI Medical Director, Marv, MMHI Kelly Ragran and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Upthegrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallo v. McBride
as 3:2020cv00952
Plaintiff:
Carl Gallo
Defendant:
Dentist McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lust v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv04300
Defendant:
Dentist Anderson and Khan Fauzia
Plaintiff:
Ryshawn Lust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jernagin v. Division #6 Dentist
as 1:2019cv08213
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Jernagin
Defendant:
Division #6 Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Medical Staff/Asst. (Dentist) of Tom Dart et al
as 1:2019cv06840
Plaintiff:
Clifton Stevenson
Defendant:
Medical Staff/Asst. (Dentist) of Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2019cv01079
Plaintiff:
Micah Asher Jefferson
Defendant:
J. Lashbrook and Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Heirs and Devisees of et al
as 3:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Heirs and Devisees of, Karen L Goble, NCO Portfolio Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tom Tuduj v. Steven Newbold, et al
as 19-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOM TUDUJ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, in his capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, STEVEN M. NEWBOLD, Doctor, Dental Director, GEORGE HENDERSON, DDS and others
Dunn v. Vandalia Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00330
Defendant:
J. Grape, Vandalia Correctional Center, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv01907
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections, Cook County Illinois, Thomas J. Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. ANTHONY JACKSON and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
