Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,117
Sharkey, Dennis v. Emmerich We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00298
Petitioner: Dennis Sharkey, II
Respondent: Warden Emmerick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Charles Benson v. Dennis Reagle
as 24-1784
Petitioner: CHARLES A. BENSON
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff: JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01195
Plaintiff: Hayes Angie, Dennis L. Hayes and Angie Hayes
Defendant: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bertrand et al
as 1:2024cv03453
Plaintiff: Dennis Bertrand and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., a Foreign Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor, Jr. v. Sgt. et al
as 3:2024cv50162
Plaintiff: Narcellus Juwan Taylor, Jr.
Defendant: Sgt., Eric T., D. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Wilson v. USA
as 24-1708
Petitioner: DENNIS WILSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CRAMER v. QUAKENBUSH
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff: KEVIN CRAMER
Defendant: DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff: Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant: Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff: Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant: Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?