Cases 21 - 30 of 231
Ashley, Tyshown v. Keyes, Warden
as 3:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Tyshown R. Ashley
Respondent:
FCI Warden Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Nekia Turner
Defendant:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Licata v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01321
Petitioner:
Joseph Licata
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
Nekia Turner
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01190
Petitioner:
Ladale Carter
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parmeley v. FCI Greenville et al
as 3:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Defendant:
FCI Greenville, N Mostert, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenderson v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01146
Petitioner:
Tereze L Fenderson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURPHY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BURNLEY v. FCC TERRE HAUTE HEALTH SERVICES UNIT et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
WALTER BURNLEY
Defendant:
FCC TERRE HAUTE HEALTH SERVICES UNIT, FCI OXFORD HEALTH SER and KWAME GYASI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Lane v. Jonathan Hemingway
as 23-1526
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK ALAN LANE
Respondent / Appellee:
FCI MILAN WARDEN and JONATHAN HEMINGWAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
