Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Hemphill v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv01475
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hemphill
Defendant:
S A Godinez, . Pfister, . Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemphill v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01879
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hemphill
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet Orthopedics, LLC and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demetrius Hemphill v. Michael Randle, et al
as 14-2897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HEMPHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Former Director Illinois Department of Corrections, MARCUS HARDY, Warden, JACKIE MILLER, Administrative Review Board/ Chairperson and others
Winn
as 4:2014cv04074
Plaintiff:
Robert Winn
Defendant:
Rock Island County, Jeffrey Boyd, Michelle L. Haun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemphill v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03450
Plaintiff:
Denise Hemphill
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv07273
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Hemphill
as 1:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
James v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv08773
Plaintiff:
Ned James, III
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Tony Preckwinkle, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv08457
Plaintiff:
Twanda D Burks , Anthony Brown , Louis Hall and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Labor Ready Midwest, Inc and QPS Employment Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
