Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Hernandez v. Synchrony Bank
as 2:2021cv00632
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Plaintiff:
Dr Natasha M Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hernandez v. Meisner
as 2:2021cv00331
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Petitioner:
Antonio M Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawpetoss v. Escalante et al
as 2:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Aptickasic Hawpetoss and Martin W Penass
Defendant:
Dionne Madosh, Meshan Hernandez Louis Moses, III, Josh Lawe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Milwaukee County House of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00293
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail Nursing Supervisor, CO Singh, Milwaukee County House of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy T Bush and Tommy T Bush, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez-Smith, Vance v. O'Donnell et al
as 3:2020cv01117
Defendant:
C. O'Donnell, M. Canziani, J. Kubala and others
Plaintiff:
Vance Hernandez-Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnette v. Schmaling et al
as 2:2020cv01792
Defendant:
Patricia Hanson, Christopher Schmaling, Wynne Laufenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixon v. Mastronardi et al
as 1:2019cv01496
Defendant:
Capt Friend, Sgt Gonzales, CO Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
Devanta Marcus Mixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derr et al v. Ta Chen International, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01178
Plaintiff:
Genoveva Hernandez-Derr and Darrell A. Derr
Not Yet Classified:
Secura Insurance, a Mutual Company
Defendant:
Ta Chen International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tenopala Hernandez et al v. Lauer et al
as 1:2019cv01093
Defendant:
Michael Lauer and Lauer Farms Inc
Plaintiff:
Armando Perez Zarate and Hilario Tenopala Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez Zarate et al v. Lauer Farms Inc
as 1:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
Armando Perez Zarate and Hilario Tenopala Hernandez
Defendant:
Lauer Farms Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
