Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Bashir Omar v. Brittany Sartain, et al
as 17-2997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BASHIR OMAR
Defendant - Appellee:
BRITTANY SARTAIN, sued as GARCIA and JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer
S.E. on behalf of C.E. v. Asbell et al
as 1:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
S.E. on behalf of C.E.
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, John Doe Correctional Officers and Peoria County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Kelly et al
as 1:2017cv04043
Plaintiff:
Erin Taylor
Defendant:
Will County, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven J. Podkulski v. Dale Massey, et al
as 17-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN J. PODKULSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE MASSEY, Lieutenant, DAVID GRAHAM, Officer, GREG MURPHY, Nurse and others
Pryor v. S.A. Godinez et al.
as 3:2016cv50105
Plaintiff:
Priest Pryor
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Luczak v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-2072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE LUCZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ANABELLE MOTTELER, Assistant Warden, JANE DOE, Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer and others
Theodore Luczak v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-8010
Petitioner:
THEODORE LUCZAK
Respondent:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrative Officer, JOY HENRY, ANABELLE MOTTELER and others
Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin v. BOP, et al
as 14-2575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK AL-MUSTAFA EL-ALAMIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, Corrections Officer, THOMAS WEBSTER, Doctor and others
Donald Hatch v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 14-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD J. HATCH
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, MS. BORON and others
Theodore Luczak v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 13-8016
Petitioner:
THEODORE LUCZAK
Respondent:
RANDY PFISTER, LIEUTENANT FRENCH, LIEUTENANT FRENCH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
