Cases 21 - 30 of 191
HOLLEY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE HOLLEY
Respondent:
T. RULE and S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KADAMOVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), COLLETTE PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CARBAJAL v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CARBAJAL
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PERKINS v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
ERNIE PERKINS
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
MARCUS R. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PARKS v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
KYLE MAURICE PARKS
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clarence Schreane v. Steve Kallis
as 23-1677
Applicant:
CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DENT v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
JASON DENT
Respondent:
KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
