Cases 21 - 30 of 33
JOHNSON v. TRANCHANT
as 1:2018cv01610
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
JAKE TRANCHANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RAND et al
as 1:2018cv01611
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
LEE RABENSTINE and MARK RAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00253
Petitioner:
Michael Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SIBLEY et al
as 1:2018cv01088
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ROBERT MULLER, ARTHUR SIBLEY and ROBERT STRADLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PHAN CLUB, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
STEVEN PHAN and PHAN CLUB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JOHNSON et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02668
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH JOHNSON and MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv00263
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS, B.S.N., ANONYMOUS, D.O.N., ANONYMOUS, M.D. #1 and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SECURITY CENTER et al
as 2:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NOEL CARTER
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY SECURITY CENTER, MICHAEL JOHNSON, HOUMAN KIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. TREADWAY et al
as 2:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
LT. TREADWAY, LT. PHELPS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
