Cases 21 - 30 of 42
STAFFORD, ET AL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 1:2017cv00289
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., CORIZON HEALTH, INC., MONICA GIPSON, R.N. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH, DOUGLAS SMITH and MICHAEL RAY STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Hutchinson
as 3:2016cv01290
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Reeves
Respondent:
Jeffrey Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INCAVO v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM et al
as 1:2016cv06047
Defendant:
COOK CANTON, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
MARIAN INCAVO
312) 327-1432 (fax:
Michael Ray Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HISER v. GOODLETT
as 4:2016cv00026
Defendant:
HAROLD GOODLETT
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY HISER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HISER v. NOEL
as 4:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY HISER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11120
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Smith and Trudy Smith
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herbert v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv10155
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Herbert
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Michael Reeves v. Rick Harrington, et al
as 15-3224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY REEVES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK HARRINGTON, Warden, ROBERT SHEARING, Doctor, MELISSA J. PHOENIX, Counselor, Menard Correctional Center and others
Michael Reeves v. Rick Harrington
as 14-1093
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY REEVES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK HARRINGTON
Laudeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Laudeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
