Cases 21 - 30 of 30
United States of America v. Filut et al
as 2:2014cv02328
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cassey Filut and City of Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Cornelius Paxton, et al
as 14-2913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELIUS PAXTON, also known as Diamond, also known as D, RANDY WALKER, RANDY PAXTON and others
Paxton et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Sara Paxton and E Stephens Paxton
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MEINEKE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv01624
Defendant:
JACK BINION, ALAN FINNAN, OFFICER CHARLES FOX and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. MEINEKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Sellers
as 2:2011cv02050
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Jennifer Sellers and City of Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Salyards et al
as 2:2009cv02319
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rusty S Salyards and Farmers Merchants National Bank of Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Beshears et al v. Bruens et al
as 2:2009cv02240
Plaintiff:
Vantice L Beshears, Jr and Chris Mehlan
Defendant:
Stacy Bruens, McGuinness, Paxton Clinic Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAXTON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2008cv01508
Plaintiff:
LINDA PAXTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
