Cases 31 - 40 of 477,387
Durham-Mcloud v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04803
Plaintiff:
Dianna Durham-Mcloud
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marquez v. Party City Holdco, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04808
Plaintiff:
Marisol Marquez
Defendant:
Party City Holdco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Little v. Jose et al.
as 1:2024cv04787
Plaintiff:
Tashima Little
Defendant:
M.A. Jose, D.E. Cornerlious and R Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Vitellaro v. City of Park Ridge et al
as 1:2024cv04797
Plaintiff:
Michael Vitellaro
Defendant:
City of Park Ridge, Frank Kaminski, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Starling v. Oak Street Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04782
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Starling
Defendant:
Oak Street Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Moore v. Best Storm Leads Corp.
as 1:2024cv04795
Plaintiff:
George Moore
Defendant:
Best Storm Leads Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Huaco v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50225
Petitioner:
Alberto Canales Huaco
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
