Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Rebecca Akin v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-1802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REBECCA ANN AKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Akin et al v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01505
Plaintiff:
George Akin and Natalie Akin
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akins et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08477
Plaintiff:
Roy Akins
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akins v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing
as 1:2016cv06960
Plaintiff:
Keisha Akins
Defendant:
Fair Collections & Outsourcing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
REYNOLDS et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 1:2016cv01367
Plaintiff:
JENNI AKINS, MAJOR AKINS, RUBY GINNS and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE ENTITIES, MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Ann Akin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
AKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01725
Petitioner:
ROBERT AKINS
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins et al v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09578
Plaintiff:
Steven Akins and Patrice Akins
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akins, Arsenio v. Dittman et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Plaintiff:
Arsenio R. Akins
Defendant:
Dittman , Meredith Nashak, Degager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Big Daddy Games LLC v. Rivas et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Big Daddy Games LLC
Defendant:
Justin Rivas, Dean Bellefeuille, Joel Checkalski and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
