Cases 31 - 40 of 1,266
Yang v. J.H. et al
as 1:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Justin Yang
Defendant:
Juliette Harris, East Peoria The Board of Trustees of the Community High School District 309 and J.H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTI v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
LENA MATTI
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OFINDIANA UNIVERSITY and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
iSense, LLC v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
as 1:2023cv11981
Plaintiff:
iSense, LLC
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
John Doe v. Purdue University, et al
as 23-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
PURDUE UNIVERSITY, PURDUE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, MITCHELL ELIAS DANIELS, JR., iin his official capacity as President of Purdue University and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CHILDERS et al v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
SHERRY CHILDERS and DIANA POLSTON
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
