Cases 31 - 40 of 114
WHITE v. SETZER et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Defendant:
MD ROGER JONES, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT, A. SETZER and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONE v. DRUMMY et al
as 2:2012cv00080
Defendant:
JULIE BEIGHLY, MR. DRUMMY, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
LAVELL BONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTIN v. WARDEN OF USP PRISON - CHARLES LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
LELAND DAVID MARTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMER. and WARDEN OF USP PRISON - CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILSON v. HOLDER
as 2:2012cv00065
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER and CHARLES LOCKETT, WARDEN
Petitioner:
JOHN WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 2:2012cv00070
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, HARVEY G. CHURCH, CHUCK GILBERT and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Defendant:
V. BOYER, LIEUTENANT BRACE, HARVEY G. CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROWN v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00028
Petitioner:
ROYCE BROWN
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TRZECIAK v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00330
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ANDREW TRZECIAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STOKES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2011cv00329
Defendant:
MRS. BIXBY, MR. BRACE, MR. COIL and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE LEE STOKES, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Rollins v. Charles Lockett
as 11-3650
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DARYL ROLLINS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
