Cases 31 - 40 of 364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Miller v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Thomas Miller
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Van Dyke v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 1:2022cv06063
Plaintiff:
Christel Van Dyke
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. d/b/a Chase Bank, a national banking association, Chase Home Finance L.L.C., Cyprexx Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TROMBLEY v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A
as 1:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. TROMBLEY
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Perry v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv04326
Plaintiff:
Jordan Perry, Jordan Perry, d/b/a Forge Fitness, n/k/a Forge PTASP LLC and Jordan Perry Individually doing business as Forge Fitness now known as Forge PTASP LLC
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lilly v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Susan Lilly
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
