Cases 31 - 40 of 172
MODESITT v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv01711
Plaintiff:
CHAD MODESITT
Defendant:
JULIA MONK, GEO GROUP INC., JESSICA DILLON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE - JAIL DIVISION et al
as 1:2021cv01509
Defendant:
SHERIFF DUANE BURGESS, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE - JAIL DIVISION, YET UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEACHER v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2021cv01392
Defendant:
AARON SMITH, DENNIS REAGLE, YOLANDA CHAMBERS and others
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDESTY v. HILL et al
as 1:2021cv01129
Defendant:
JENNY REWERTS, CARLA ROSSELOT, Sgt. S. HILL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO HARDESTY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardesty v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Jenny Rewerts, Carla Rosselot, Duane Alsip and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Leo Hardesty, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STACY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
BILLY STACY
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, MASON, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANDLEY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DUAN PEARCE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUVALL v. USA
as 3:2020cv00270
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DUANE A. DUVALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
REAVES v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02945
Defendant:
KRIS PRYOR, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JENNIFER STURM and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2020cv02455
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, MATTHEW VANDINE, CHANCE BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JACONIAH FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
