Cases 31 - 40 of 46
WILSON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2016cv00293
Defendant:
AMY BARBAR, DICK BROWN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ROTHENBURG et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Defendant:
CILLOABACHIE, COLLWAY, DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. French et al
as 1:2016cv01053
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
French, Pierce, G Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Punke et al
as 1:2016cv01038
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Jackson
Defendant:
. Punke, . Prentice, N Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00356
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Wilson v. USA
as 15-2642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES G. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILSON v. SUPERINTENDANT
as 1:2015cv01209
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT
Petitioner:
JAMES G. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00214
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JAMES G. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. KERMON et al
as 2:2015cv00188
Defendant:
BALLARD, ROBERT CLOVER, JERRY ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. KERMON et al
as 2:2015cv00187
Defendant:
BALLARD, ROBERT CLOVER, JERRY ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
