Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Timothy Sanders v. P.O. John Doe 1-2
as 1:2013cv02952
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sanders
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nancy Lopez v. P.O. John Doe 1-2 et al
as 1:2013cv02619
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lopez
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe 1-2 and P.O. Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynette Kirchner v. P.O. John Doe 1-2
as 1:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Lynette Kirchner
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcia Holton v. P.O. John Doe 1-2
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Marcia Holton
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Target Outlet Store et al
as 1:2011cv03109
Plaintiff:
Ernest L Brown
Defendant:
Target Outlet Store and John Does 1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. MTV Networks on Campus, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv50144
Plaintiff:
Malcomb Ball
Defendant:
MTV Networks on Campus, Inc. , Live Nation Concerts, Inc. , Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Castleberry v. Ghoston, et al
as 1:2010cv01769
Plaintiff:
Steven Castleberry
Defendant:
Detective Ghoston, Officer Jones, Officer Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson vs. Vasavid, et al.
as 1:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Hughest Gibson
Defendant:
Sgt Vasavid and John Does 1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv04505
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez, David Rodriguez, David Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago and John Does 1 - 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Doe 1-2 et al
as 1:2009cv04092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Henderson, Ryan Henderson, Ryan Henderson and others
Defendant:
John Doe 1-2 and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
