Cases 31 - 40 of 53
JOHNSON v. PERSON et al
as 1:2014cv02110
Defendant:
JOANN DINGER and DR. PERSON
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2014cv00838
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS and GEO GROUP
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tinoco et al v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2014cv01456
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tinoco , Bruce Todd , Byron Young and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JOHNSON v. LEMMON
as 2:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SHROYER
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Defendant:
J. SHROYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2013cv00306
Petitioner:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Respondent:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00283
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, M. GADBERRY, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HINTON et al
as 2:2013cv00193
Defendant:
BRENDA HINTON, T. LITTLEJOHN and K. RICHARDS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00181
Defendant:
MIKE BARNES, RICHARD BROWN, M. GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BROWN
as 2:2013cv00171
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
