Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Crouse et al v. M&M Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03419
Plaintiff:
Louis Crouse and Kerri Perkins
Defendant:
M&M Logistics, Inc. and Earving Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harding v. M&M Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11233
Defendant:
M&M Logistics, Inc. and Earving Cole
Plaintiff:
Lucious Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Sears et al
as 1:2015cv07487
Defendant:
Joshua T Sears and M & M Transport Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2015cv00818
Plaintiff:
M M Renee Edwards
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
MCGLOTHLEN et al v. M & M ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
as 3:2014cv00174
Defendant:
M & M ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCGLOTHLEN and WANDA LYNNE MCGLOTHLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
M. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 3:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
M. M.
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
M. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 4:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
M. M.
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2314
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
B. et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2014cv00422
Plaintiff:
A. B., K. M., M. M. and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Eclipse Manufacturing Company, et al
as 14-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY AND SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, as successor in interest to Fire and Casualty Insurance Company of Connecticut
Defendant:
ECLIPSE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, M & M RENTAL CENTER, INCORPORATED and FIRST SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HINMAN and ITALIA FOODS INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
